Evaluation of the hematological and immunological markers after the first and second doses of BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine.

OBJECTIVE: Both humoral and cellular immunity can be significantly influenced by the immunological responses to vaccination, and both responses are essential. Vaccination is the most consistent, safe, and cost-efficient practice for controlling the COVID-19 pandemic. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Blood samples were collected from participants who received two vaccine doses of COVID-19 Pfizer/BioNTech (BNT162b2) before and on days 7 and 10 after the first and second immunization. We evaluated some hematological and immunological markers responses to the 1st and 2nd doses of the BNT162b2 mRNA (Pfizer/BioNtech) vaccine. RESULTS: In healthy subjects' neutrophil and WBC counts significantly increased compared to those after the first dose. The results of all first-group participant categories demonstrated no discernible variations in lymphocyte counts. There was no change in IgM or IgG in all second-group cohorts, except for a considerable rise in IgG levels in people with a history of coronavirus infection following the second dosage compared to baseline. After the second dose, CD4+ T-cell and CD8+ T-cell levels rose in all groups compared to before the immunization and after the first dosage. Data demonstrated a substantial rise in neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) after the second dose of the vaccine. Individuals who had previously had COVID-19 disease experienced a considerable increase in C3 and C4 levels after the first and second dosages compared to baseline. Additionally, compared to their levels after the first dosage, C4 levels increased significantly following the second dosage. Interleukin (IL)-6, IL-15, macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF), granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF), interferon gamma-induced protein 10 (IP-10/CXCL10), and macrophage inflammatory protein-1 alpha (MIP-1α/CCL3) levels were increased after boost correlated with Spike antibody levels, supporting their utility as indicators of successful humoral immunity development in response to vaccination. CONCLUSIONS: We can conclude that the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine produced a more potent T-cell response than humoral ones.

The potential therapeutic effect of metformin in type 2 diabetic patients with severe COVID-19.

OBJECTIVE: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is regarded as a chief risk factor for(coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) owing to dysregulation of the expression of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) and chronic low-grade inflammatory disorders. Metformin, an insulin-sensitizing agent for managing T2DM, has pleiotropic anti-inflammatory and oxidant potentials, which may lessen the risk of diabetic complications. So, we aimed to reveal the potential role of metformin monotherapy in treating T2DM patients with COVID-19. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, 60 hospitalized T2DM patients with COVID-19 on metformin plus standard anti-COVID-19 treatments compared to 40 hospitalized T2DM patients with COVID-19 on other diabetic pharmacotherapy like insulin and sulfonylurea, were recruited. Inflammatory and oxidative stress biomarkers and radiological and clinical outcomes were assessed at admission time and at the time of discharge. RESULTS: The results of this study illustrated that metformin treatment in T2DM patients with COVID-19 was more effective in reducing inflammatory and oxidative stress biomarkers with significant amelioration of radiological scores and clinical outcomes compared to T2DM patients with COVID-19 on another diabetic pharmacotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings highlighted that metformin efficiently managed T2DM patients with COVID-19 by reducing inflammatory and oxidative stress with mitigating effects on the radiological scores and clinical outcomes.

Elucidation of the role of α-lipoic acid and vitamin C in methotrexate-induced hepatoxicity in mice.

OBJECTIVE: Although methotrexate (MTX) is used to treat several malignancies and chronic inflammatory diseases, its clinical use is constrained because of its negative side effects, the most prevalent of which are hepatotoxicity and nephrotoxicity. So, this study aims to determine whether α-lipoic acid (ALA) and vitamin C can protect mice against the liver damage that methotrexate causes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 49 male mice were divided into seven groups at random. Group I received sodium bicarbonate, while groups II to VII received an intraperitoneal injection of MTX (20 mg/kg) on the tenth day, following ten days of pretreatment with ALA (60 mg/Kg), ALA (120 mg/Kg), vitamin C (100 mg/Kg), vitamin C (200 mg/Kg), ALA (60 mg/Kg), and vitamin C (100 mg/kg). RESULTS: When compared to mice in group I, mice in group II (the control group) had significantly higher levels of the enzymes malondialdehyde (MDA), alanine transaminase (ALT), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and significantly lower (p <0.05) levels of the enzymes superoxide dismutase (SOD) and glutathione (GSH). As compared to the control group, pretreatment groups with ALA and vitamin C showed a dose-dependent substantial rise (p <0.05) in GSH and SOD levels, a dose-dependent notable decrease (p <0.05) in MDA, ALT, ALP, and LDH levels, and better liver histological architecture. In order to increase the antioxidant capacity, pretreatment with ALA and vitamin C may be able to prevent MTX-induced hepatotoxicity. CONCLUSIONS: These results imply that ALA and vitamin C are useful in the treatment of MTX-induced liver damage.

Possible mechanistic insights into iron homeostasis role of the action of 4-aminoquinolines (chloroquine/hydroxychloroquine) on COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) infection.

OBJECTIVE: With the recent direction in drug repurposing, many approved drugs have been evaluated to assess their effect on the coronavirus or SARS-CoV-2 infection (COVID-19). Driving this path, chloroquine (CQ) has been used in the treatment of malaria and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) in immunomodulatory and anti-thrombotic action, playing a leading role in initial management of the viral infection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Literature search was done using Google Scholar, PubMed and Scopus database using keywords "chloroquine" "SARS-CoV-2" "COVID-19" "mechanism of action" and articles of interest were selected providing evidence of the possible role of CQ in viral infection. RESULTS: In a bid to understand how and if CQ and HCQ would exert their anti-viral property, mechanistic exegesis was done to review various proposed mechanisms of action. This revealed the inhibition of viral attachment and entry, inhibition of enveloped glycoprotein, inhibition of the development and proliferation of new viral particles as the way they perform their action. There is an interplay between iron metabolism and homeostasis with COVID-19 infection and viral reproduction. CONCLUSIONS: This study aims to show the functional role of CQ and HCQ, as well as to provide possible mechanistic insight on the role of iron on viral infection, iron starvation and its downstream cellular pathways involving hepcidin and proinflammatory cytokines. The overall aim of providing possible mode of action of CQ and HCQ in the management of COVID-19 infection is exhibited via its anti-viral, anti-inflammatory and anti-thrombotic activities.